Film review: After Hours (1985)


A drama/comedy that takes place in a single night in New York. It’s a very unpredictable story, the beginning doesn’t prepare you for what will happen later. The characters slowly reveal themselves. Originally titled Lies, then A Night in SoHo, the story follows the misfortunes of Paul, a young computer operator, who accepts an invitation from an attractive women he’s met in a diner.

The atmosphere is very unique to me in this film, it’s along with the excellent music almost a character in its own right. The making of calls it “nightmarish” or “surrealistic”. I thought the acting by Rosanna Arquette was poor, though.

There is a high level of suspense in After Hours, which is technically a comedy but plays like a version of the classic Hitchcock plot formula about the innocent man wrongly accused. Film critic Roger Ebert: “The plague of bad luck seems generated by some unexplained divine wrath.”

It was shot entirely at night, sometimes with on-the-spot-improvisation of camera movements. In the making of they explain Tim Burton was going to direct, but because Scorsese’s ‘The Last Temptation of Christ’ fell apart in early 80s, Scorsese became interested and directed After Hours, and Burton withdrew from the project.

Scorsese has suggested that Paul’s implacable run of bad luck reflected his own frustration during the Last Temptation of Christ experience, where his Jesus film couldn’t get made in the early 80s. Agents promised him a “go”, everything was in place, and then time after time an unexpected development would threaten everything. In After Hours, each new person Paul meets promises that they will take care of him, make him happy, lend him money, give him a place to stay, let him use the phone, trust him with their keys, drive him home – and every offer of mercy turns into an unanticipated danger. The film could be read as an emotional autobiography of that period in Scorsese’s life.

One of Scorsese’s lesser known films. In my opinion this film doesn’t get enough credit. People always seem to talk about his other work. It’s not your typical Scorsese movie at all, very little violence or swearing, closer to The King of Comedy than his gangster movies. I’m glad De Niro didn’t appear, refreshing to see a relative unknown in the lead in Griffin Dunne.


Not a film everyone has heard of. It’s now in my top 5 Scorsese movies along with Taxi Driver (1976), The Last Temptation of Christ (1988) and The King of Comedy (1982). Never been a fan of Scorsese’s gangster stuff or any gangster movies for that matter. You may notice I haven’t added gangster flicks or westerns on my A-Z of film recommendations on the blog, because I don’t usually like them. An exception to the rule is The Sting (1973), which I enjoyed.

After Hours brought Scorsese the Best Director prize at Cannes, although its commercial success was modest.

Probably not a film I’ll be seeing many times, as the surprises are more effective first time around, but enjoyable to watch once or twice, I’d say. I’m not sure you can call it an independent film, but it certainly feels like an indie.

Have you seen it, what did you think of After Hours?

89% on RT and 7.6/10 on IMDB

IMDB

Rottentomatoes

Sources:
Scorsese on Scorsese (2003)
Scorsese by Ebert (2008)
Making of

(Revised review)

11 thoughts on “Film review: After Hours (1985)

  1. Great job highlighting this film. Like you, I wouldn't watch it too often, but I do like it quite a bit, and though it's not my favorite Scorsese, it's one that I feel often gets overlooked in his body of work. Nice blog!

    Like

  2. I absolutely love this movie. Griffin Dunne should have been in more films. Scorsese done some great films in his time but I love this and King of Comedy more than the rest.

    Like

  3. @M. Carter: its an entertaining ride.

    @CMrok93: A bit like Scorsese's The King of Comedy, its tough to pinpoint After Hours, both films are a hybrid of genres and slightly odd.

    @ Dan: If you're a fan of The King of Comedy, I'd enjoy to hear your take on it- I reviewed it last week as part of my Scorsese blogathon.

    Like

  4. Lots of stuff make this worth watching. Seen it in the theater when it was released. A bad dream done well. The scene where he doesn’t have enough money to get on the subway because the fare went up just a few minutes earlier.
    I will be popping in to lay down some comments. Lots of good stuff here.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Yup. I will we swinging by your takes on a regular basis. I don’t watch very much TV (none) but a friend of mine recommended ‘The Bridge’ a few years ago. First two seasons were excellent. I might pick your brain for a few films from your side. I’ve caught a few good ones already.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s